Another nice thing about having a next() built-in is that it makes getting the first item of a generator expression a lot more elegant, IMHO. I think this: next(item for item in items if item > 3) is a lot clearer than this: (item for item in items if item > 3).next() or alternatives that would break this into multiple statements. [inspired by a recent python-list question] -- Michael Hoffman <hoffman at ebi.ac.uk> European Bioinformatics Institute
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4