At 09:34 AM 3/4/2006 -0800, Anna Ravenscroft wrote: >I think this is a really good point. next() is supposed to get used, by >coders, in regular code - so it shouldn't be __next__. I can understand >the desire for both forms, although that seems it would clutter things up >unnecessarily - particularly if the two do the same thing. By this argument, we should be using ob.len() instead of len(ob), and ob.iter() instead of iter(ob).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4