On 3/3/06, Phillip J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote: > At 04:09 PM 3/3/2006 -0500, Jeremy Hylton wrote: > >I think it is a little odd that next is not spelled __next__, but I > >appreciate the reasons given here in particular. Every time I right > >.next(), I'm happy that it doesn't have underscores. > > But then next(ob) should make you even happier, because then there's no > '.', either. :) I've got no problem with dots. No shift key necessary :-). On the subject of predilections and builtins, I find myself typing .size() a lot lately. Too much C++, I guess, but it seems so natural as I type it. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4