At 04:09 PM 3/3/2006 -0500, Jeremy Hylton wrote: >I think it is a little odd that next is not spelled __next__, but I >appreciate the reasons given here in particular. Every time I right >.next(), I'm happy that it doesn't have underscores. But then next(ob) should make you even happier, because then there's no '.', either. :)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4