Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > On 6/29/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: >> We should remove/change this comment. It is utterly misleading. > > To a warning/error stating that you miss a compiler? Correct: that you miss VS 2003, or should request mingw. >> Forget about Visual Studio 8 and .NET 2.0. It won't help here. > > I only have .NET 1.1 and 2.0 and Visual Studio 2005 (8) installed. Why > should I forget about it? Is Python compiled with much older compilers > and thus unable to work together in a nice way or? "Much" is a relative thing, but yes. Python 2.3 and before is compiled with VC6, Python 2.4 and 2.5 are compiled with VS 2003. You cannot compile extensions with a different compiler version because the CRT versions will clash (msvcrt4 vs. msvcr71 vs. msvcr8) Google for details, this has been discussed both technically and politically many times before. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4