Guido van Rossum wrote: >> Is it unacceptable - or impractical - to break the addition of switch >> to python in two (minor version separated) steps ? > > But what's the point? We have until Python 3000 anyway. except that we may want to "reserve" the necessary keywords in 2.6... </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4