Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Again, I believe this is all included for ExtensionClasses: it looks > for __class__ on the object if the type check fails, so that an > ExtensionClass could be actually a class derived from the C type. Now that we have had new-style classes for quite a while, is there still a need to support ExtensionClasses? -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4