Fredrik Lundh wrote: > Nick Maclaren wrote: > >> Unfortunately, that doesn't help, because it is not where the issues >> are. What I don't know is how much you know about numerical models, >> IEEE 754 in particular, and C99. You weren't active on the SC22WG14 >> reflector, but there were some lurkers. > > SC22WG14? is that some marketing academy? not a very good one, obviously. http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/ Looks like python-dev for C, only with extra servings of international bureaucracy and vendor self-interest to make life more complicated ;) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4