Talin wrote:
> I don't get what the problem is here. A switch constant should have
> exactly the bahavior of a default value of a function parameter. We
> don't seem to have too many problems defining functions at the module
> level, do we?
Because in function definitions, if you put them inside another function, the
defaults of the inner function get reevaluated every time the outer function
is run. Doing that for the switch statement would kinda defeat the whole
point. . .
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4