At 09:55 AM 6/21/2006 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote: >BTW a switch in a class should be treated the same as a global switch. >But what about a switch in a class in a function? Okay, now my head hurts. :) A switch in a class doesn't need to be treated the same as a global switch, because locals()!=globals() in that case. I think the top-level is the only thing that really needs a special case vs. the general "error if you use a local variable in the expression" rule. Actually, it might be simpler just to always reject local variables -- even at the top-level -- and be done with it.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4