RetroSearch Browse

Wed Jun 21 15:07:35 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-June/066315.html

On Wed, Jun 21, 2006, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Facundo Batista wrote:
>> 
>> BTW, prove me Decimal is not fast enough, ;)
> 
> C:\Python24>python -m timeit -s "x = 1.0" "x+x"
> 10000000 loops, best of 3: 0.137 usec per loop
> 
> C:\Python24>python -m timeit -s "from decimal import Decimal as d; x = d(1)" "x+x"
> 10000 loops, best of 3: 48.3 usec per loop
> 
> I don't really know my definition of 'fast enough to be the basic
> floating point type', but I'm pretty sure that a couple of orders of
> magnitude slower isn't it. I guess I'll find out what my definition is
> if the C implementation manages to get there ;)

Why isn't that fast enough?  Relative speed is *not* the issue when
talking about real-world applications.  More to the point, the
expectation is that the C implementation of Decimal will have faster
conversion to/from string, which in many real world applications forms a
significant part of the processing load.
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"I saw `cout' being shifted "Hello world" times to the left and stopped
right there."  --Steve Gonedes

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-June/066315.html below:

[Python-Dev] Numerical robustness, IEEE etc.