At 10:14 PM 6/20/2006 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote: >Hm, so this still doesn't help if you write > > case S: ... > >(where S is an immutable set or sequence) when you meant > > case in S: ... > >so I'm not sure if it's worth the subtleties. Well, EIBTI and all that: switch x: case == 1: foo(x) case in S: bar(x) It even lines up nicely. :)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4