Guido van Rossum wrote: > But it would be easy enough to define a dict-filling function that > updates only new values. Or evaluate the case expressions in reverse order. > Was it decided yet how to write the cases for a switch that tests for > tuples of values? Requiring parentheses might be sufficient, > essentially making what follows a case *always* take on sequence > syntax. Sounds good to me. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4