Aahz wrote: > Did we make a final decision about whether the canonical location for > ElementTree should be xml or xmlcore? the original idea was to use "xml" to get the latest and greatest from either the core or PyXML, "xmlcore" to use the bundled version. I see no reason to change this just because people have short memory ;-) (in other words, the modules should be documented as xml.xxx, with a note that says that they're also available as xmlcore.xxx. this applies to all modules under xml, not just etree.). > Also, there's no ElementTree or > xmlcore that I can find at http://docs.python.org/dev/ under global > module index or library reference. the docs are still sitting in the patch tracker. looks like the "just post text files; we'll fix the markup" approach doesn't work. oh well, there's plenty of time to fix that before 2.5 final. </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4