Guido van Rossum wrote: > I wonder if there should be two default clauses, or some other > syntactic way to indicate whether we expect all x to be hashable? switch expr: case 1: statements case 2: statements else: statements except KeyError: statements finally: statements switch expr: case 1: statements case 2: statements else: statements except KeyError: statements finally: statements :) Seriously, I think I'd rather be explicit and just have KeyError propagate. If someone is expecting occasional unhashable values, they can just wrap it in try/except. try: switch expr: case 1: statements case 2: statements else: statements except KeyError: statements finally: statements The first syntax though does have the advantage that it could catch only KeyErrors raised from the switch statement. That could be easily handled by a separate SwitchKeyError exception (inheriting from KeyError). Tim Delaney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4