At 11:23 AM 6/18/2006 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote: >I'm not in favor of abusing this to generate a computed goto, and I >don't see a need for that -- if we decide to add that (either as >syntax or as an automatic optimization) I see no problem adding a new >bytecode. Me either -- I suggest simply adding a JUMP_TOP -- but I wanted to point out that people wouldn't need to add a new opcode in order to experiment with possible "switch" syntaxes.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4