A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-June/066170.html below:

[Python-Dev] An obscene computed goto bytecode hack for "switch" :)

[Python-Dev] An obscene computed goto bytecode hack for "switch" :) [Python-Dev] An obscene computed goto bytecode hack for "switch" :)Phillip J. Eby pje at telecommunity.com
Sun Jun 18 22:10:00 CEST 2006
At 11:23 AM 6/18/2006 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>I'm not in favor of abusing this to generate a computed goto, and I
>don't see a need for that -- if we decide to add that (either as
>syntax or as an automatic optimization) I see no problem adding a new
>bytecode.

Me either -- I suggest simply adding a JUMP_TOP -- but I wanted to point 
out that people wouldn't need to add a new opcode in order to experiment 
with possible "switch" syntaxes.

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4