RetroSearch Browse

Sun Jun 18 20:07:32 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-June/066164.html

On 6/17/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> Talin wrote:
> > The motivation, as I understand it, is one of mathematical consistency.
>
> Noam told me in private email that this is *not* the motivation.
> Instead, he wants mutable values. This, in turn, he wants so he
> can catch modifications.

That cannot be the only motivation. He can have mutable values today
without any new syntax. (Either he can use x[()] or he can use
attribute assignment.)

But more to the point, this discussion is pointless, since I won't
accept the syntax change.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-June/066164.html below:

Allow Empty Subscript List Without Parentheses