M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > Since replace() only works on string objects, it appears > as if a temporary string object would have to be created. > However, this would involve an unnecessary allocation > and copy process... it appears as if the refactoring > during the NFS sprint left out that case. what's the beta 1 status ? fixing this should be trivial, but I don't have any cycles to spare today. </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4