Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-June/066014.html below:

[Python-Dev] xrange vs. int.__getslice__

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r46795 - in python/trunk: Doc/lib/libstdtypes.tex Lib/test/string_tests.py Misc/NEWS Objects/stringobject.c Objects/unicodeobject.c
• Next message: [Python-Dev] xrange vs. int.__getslice__
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

You were bothered yet with function xrange ? :) I suggest to replace it.

---------------------------------------------
        for i in xrange(100): pass
vs.
        for i in int[:100]: pass
---------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------
        for i in xrange(1000, 1020): pass
vs.
        for i in int[1000:1020]: pass
---------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------
        for i in xrange(200, 100, -2): pass
vs.
        for i in int[200:100:-2]: pass
---------------------------------------------

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r46795 - in python/trunk: Doc/lib/libstdtypes.tex Lib/test/string_tests.py Misc/NEWS Objects/stringobject.c Objects/unicodeobject.c
• Next message: [Python-Dev] xrange vs. int.__getslice__
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4