On 6/12/06, Fredrik Lundh <fredrik at pythonware.com> wrote: > > Phillip J. Eby wrote: > > > I'd still rather have a Packages/ directory, but beggars can't be > > choosers. > > there's plenty of time to work on that for 2.6... I have started a thread on python-3000 to try to get a PEP pulled together to solidify what we want for accepted PEPs and thus lock down what is expected. I purposely started out heavy-handed to get discussion going to get some back and forth going to work something out. Started the thread there instead of here since I hope the resulting PEP can be used to help decide what modules should be ripped out in Py3K. We can then use the guidelines for future acceptance for the 2.x branch. -Brett -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060612/2eb12bdd/attachment.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4