RetroSearch Browse

Mon Jun 12 20:05:02 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-June/065928.html

On 6/12/06, Fredrik Lundh <fredrik at pythonware.com> wrote:
>
> Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>
> > Then I guess we should deal with before 2.5b1, and delay 2.5b1 until the
> > status of each of these has been clarified.
> >
> > Each maintainer should indicate whether he is happy with a "this is
> > part of Python" approach. If so, the entry should be removed from PEP
> > 360 (*); if not, the code should be removed from Python before beta 1.
>
> is this "we don't give a fuck about 3rd party developers and users"
> attitude
> really representative for the python-dev community and the PSF ?

Well, obviously I care since I wrote the PEP in the first place.

But I don't think this is trying to say they don't care.  People just want
to lower the overhead of maintaining the distro.  Having to report bugs and
patches to an external location instead of just getting to fix it directly
is a hassle that poeple don't ask for.  Plus it is bound to get forgotten by
accident, so planning for it doesn't hurt.

-Brett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060612/93861c49/attachment.htm 

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-June/065928.html below:

[Python-Dev] Dropping externally maintained packages (Was: Please stop changing wsgiref on the trunk)