Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Then I guess we should deal with before 2.5b1, and delay 2.5b1 until the > status of each of these has been clarified. > > Each maintainer should indicate whether he is happy with a "this is > part of Python" approach. If so, the entry should be removed from PEP > 360 (*); if not, the code should be removed from Python before beta 1. is this "we don't give a fuck about 3rd party developers and users" attitude really representative for the python-dev community and the PSF ? </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4