Simon Percivall wrote: >> how about tweaking the xml loader to map "xml.foo" to "_xmlplus.foo" >> only if that subpackage really exists ? > > I'm a bit confused by what the problem is. I though this was all > handled like it should be now. that's how I thought things were done, but then I read Fred's post, and looked at the source code, and didn't see this line: _xmlplus.__path__.extend(xmlcore.__path__) or-maybe-someone's-been-using-the-time-machine-ly yrs /F
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4