RetroSearch Browse

Sun Jun 11 12:09:39 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-June/065857.html

Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:

> With the introduction of the xmlcore package in Python 2.5, should we document 
> xml.etree or xmlcore.etree?  If someone installs PyXML with Python 2.5, I 
> don't think they're going to get xml.etree, which will be really confusing.  
> We can be sure that xmlcore.etree will be there.

I think it would be unfortunate if an external, mostly unmaintained 
package could claim absolute ownership of the xml package root.

how about tweaking the xml loader to map "xml.foo" to "_xmlplus.foo" 
only if that subpackage really exists ?

</F>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-June/065857.html below:

[Python-Dev] 2.5 issues need resolving in a few days