Ka-Ping Yee wrote: > I think the whole discussion about the concept and meaning of > zero-dimensional arrays is mostly irrelevant to the original > issue. The original issue is a *syntax* question: should > x[()] be written as x[]? But, at least as presented in the PEP, it's a syntax that was motivated by a perceived need for dealing with 0D arrays. So it seems relevant to ask whether 0D arrays are really needed or not. Does anyone have any other use case for this syntax? -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4