RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jun 9 11:32:14 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-June/065735.html

Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> 
>> The results were produced by pybench 2.0 and use time.time
>> on Linux, plus a different calibration strategy. As a result
>> these timings are a lot more repeatable than with pybench 1.3
>> and I've confirmed the timings using several runs to make sure.
> 
> can you check in 2.0 ?  (if it's not quite ready for public consumption, 
> put it in the sandbox).

I'll check it in once it's ready for prime-time, either later
today or early next week.

You can download a current snapshot from:

http://www.egenix.com/files/python/pybench-2.0-2006-06-09.zip

-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
eGenix.com

Professional Python Services directly from the Source  (#1, Jun 09 2006)
>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ...        http://www.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ...             http://zope.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ...        http://python.egenix.com/
________________________________________________________________________
2006-07-03: EuroPython 2006, CERN, Switzerland              23 days left

::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,FreeBSD for free ! ::::

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-June/065735.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python Benchmarks