M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > The results were produced by pybench 2.0 and use time.time > on Linux, plus a different calibration strategy. As a result > these timings are a lot more repeatable than with pybench 1.3 > and I've confirmed the timings using several runs to make sure. can you check in 2.0 ? (if it's not quite ready for public consumption, put it in the sandbox). </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4