A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-June/065693.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python Benchmarks

[Python-Dev] Python Benchmarks [Python-Dev] Python BenchmarksFredrik Lundh fredrik at pythonware.com
Thu Jun 8 14:35:47 CEST 2006
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:

> The pybench results match those of timeit.py on my test machine
> in both cases.

but they don't match the timeit results on similar machines, nor do they 
  reflect what was done at the sprint.

> Tools/pybench> ~/projects/Python/Installation/bin/python Calls.py
> 10 loops, best of 3: 21.8 msec per loop

10 loops ?

what happens if you run the actual test code (the stuff inside the for 
loop) inside timeit, instead of running your test loop inside timeit?

</F>

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4