On Wed, Jun 07, 2006, Raymond Hettinger wrote: >Fredrik: >> >> for users, it's actually quite simple to figure out what's in the _ >> variable: it's the most recently *printed* result. if you cannot see >> it, it's not in there. > > Of course, there's a pattern to it. The question is whether it is the > *right* behavior. Would the underscore assignment be more useful and > intuitive if it always contained the immediately preceding result, > even if it was None? In some cases (such as the regexp example), None > is a valid and useful possible result of a computation and you may > want to access that result with _. My take is that Fredrik is correct about the current behavior being most generally useful even if it is slightly less consistent, as well as being undesired in rare circumstances. Consider that your message is the only one I've seen in more than five years of monitoring python-dev and c.l.py. -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "I saw `cout' being shifted "Hello world" times to the left and stopped right there." --Steve Gonedes
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4