M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > I believe that using wall-clock timers > for benchmarking is not a good approach due to the high > noise level. Process time timers typically have a lower > resolution, but give a better picture of the actual > run-time of your code and also don't exhibit as much noise > as the wall-clock timer approach. please stop repeating this nonsense. there are no "process time timers" in con- temporary operating systems; only tick counters. there are patches for linux and commercial add-ons to most platforms that lets you use hardware performance counters for process stuff, but there's no way to emulate that by playing with different existing Unix or Win32 API:s; the thing you think you're using simply isn't there. </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4