Michele Simionato wrote: > Georg Brandl <g.brandl <at> gmx.net> writes: > >> I'd say, go ahead and write a patch including docs, and I think there's no >> problem with accepting it (as long as it comes before beta1). > > I was having a look at http://docs.python.org/dev/lib/inspect-types.html > and it would seem that adding isgenerator would imply changing > inspect.getmembers() and its documentation. Yep. > Also, should one add > a GeneratorType, perhaps as a subclass of FunctionType? Add GeneratorType where? There is already one in the types module. Georg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4