Nick Coghlan wrote: > Sylvain Fourmanoit wrote: >>Armin Rigo wrote: >> >>>If it goes in that direction, I'd suggest to rename the module to give >>>it a name closer to existing persistence-related modules already in the >>>stdlib. >> >>I am not especially fond of the current miniconf name either; I didn't >>find something more suitable, yet evocative of what it does; I would be >>glad to hear any suggestion you or the rest of the developers would have. > > pyson :) Following the pattern of JSON, it would be "PYON" (PYthon Object Notation). -- David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood at blueyonder.co.uk>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4