At 07:33 AM 7/28/2006 +0200, Martin v. Löwis wrote: >Phillip J. Eby wrote: > > I'm willing to write code that makes it PEP 302 compliant, if the release > > manager will bless such an addition. But if that's not acceptable, then > > somebody needs to produce the necessary documentation updates or revert > the > > patch. It absolutely should not be allowed to remain in *and* > undocumented > > because it is a backwards-incompatible change to documented behavior of > > Python for two major releases (2.3 and 2.4). > >You don't need a release manager pronouncement for that. It's a bug, >changing it is a bug fix, you don't need RM permission to fix a bug. > >Do you have a patch ready that restores path_importer_cache behavior, >yet preserves the property that it caches existence of a directory? >If not, I will have to produce one. The issue is that a proper fix that caches existence requires adding new types to import.c and thus might appear to be more of a feature. I was therefore reluctant to embark upon the work without some assurance that it wouldn't be rejected as adding a last-minute feature.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4