On 7/27/06, Phillip J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote: > > Personally, I would prefer to see it properly fixed in 2.5 rather than > having to rip it out. It's more work for me to create the proper fix than > it is to just work around it in my code, but it seems a more righteous > labor, if you know what I mean. It also means that already-shipped and > distributed versions of my code would work with the 2.5 release. Based on this comment, is it really acceptable to just document a behaviour change? ISTM there should really only be 2 choices: fix 2.5 properly or revert the change. This seemed to be Armin's position. n
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4