Jason Orendorff wrote: >> However, I'm also struggling to think of a case other than list vs >> deque where the choice of a builtin or standard library data >> structure would be dictated by big-O() concerns. > > OK, but that doesn't mean the information is unimportant. +1 on > making this something of a priority. People looking for this info > should find it in the obvious place. Some are unobvious. (How fast is > dict.__eq__ on average? Worst case?) I also found out that most people tend to think of Python's lists as a magical data structure optimized for many operations (like a "rope" or something complex like that). Documenting that it's just a bare vector (std::vector in C++) would be of great help. -- Giovanni Bajo
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4