Nick Maclaren wrote: > When such arithmetic is implemented in hardware, it is normal for > exceptional cases to be handled by interrupt, and that is VERY > expensive ... It then becomes important to know how > many of the things you got, to know whether it is worth putting > code in to avoid them or even using a different algorithm. But couldn't you just put in an interrupt handler that counts the interrupts, for the purpose of measurement? -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4