... [Raymond] >> Even then, we need to drop the concept of having the flags as counters >> rather than booleans. [Georg Brandl] > Yes. Given that even Tim couldn't imagine a use case for counting the > exceptions, I think it's sensible. That's not it -- someone will "find a use" for anything. It's unfortunate that we used a dict with counts because the /standard/ we're trying to meet requires no such thing, and clearly had a "pile of on/off bits" model in mind. Extending a standard without strong need creates problems (for example, this one <0.5 wink>).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4