On 7/14/06, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > > On 7/14/06, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > > On 7/14/06, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > > > Whoa, whoa. What's the *problem* we're trying to solve here? > > > > I have a use case for sandboxing. I am already having to plan to have a > > mini-sys module in a sandbox so that they cannot get access to dangerous > > things. > > OK, then I propose that we wait to see which things you end up having > to provide to sandboxed code, rather than trying to analyze it to > death in abstracto. Fine by me. My design doc already has a preliminary list going that people can take a look at. But it could still change if security analysis shows possible problems with exposing some of them. -Brett -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060714/0dbcccc5/attachment.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4