RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jul 14 13:30:36 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-July/067427.html

    Greg> Maybe there could be an "unstable" release phase that lasts for a
    Greg> whole release cycle. So you'd first release version 2.n as
    Greg> "unstable", and keep 2.(n-1) as the current "stable" release. Then
    Greg> when 2.(n+1) is ready, 2.n would become "stable" and 2.(n+1) would
    Greg> become the new "unstable".

In GCC don't they do an odd (stable)/even (unstable) release schedule?  Same
for Linux kernels?  Would that help?

Skip

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-July/067427.html below:

[Python-Dev] Community buildbots (was Re: User's complaints)