On 7/12/06, Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> wrote: > > On Thursday 13 July 2006 14:46, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Thanks for confirming memory! So it was an intentional regression; > > "bugs happen" doesn't apply in this case. And an unfortunate > > regression at that -- not because one guy writes a silly blog entry > > about it, but because it breaks real code -- undocumented be > > damned. > > > > Are we going to fix it, without allowing those crashes again? > > I already said "yes" for 2.5. Brett, can you work up a patch? Yep, it's on my todo list and will get done. Might have to wait until next week, though (if that is okay), since my girlfriend is leaving town Sunday and thus I will have a ton more time after that. -Brett -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060712/3aae1f34/attachment.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4