A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-July/067275.html below:

[Python-Dev] get for lists and tuples?

[Python-Dev] get for lists and tuples? [Python-Dev] get for lists and tuples?Georg Brandl g.brandl at gmx.net
Tue Jul 11 20:17:35 CEST 2006
Anthony Baxter wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 July 2006 03:39, Georg Brandl wrote:
>> > Anyway, I'm just testing the waters. If it's not heresy then I'd
>> > like to do what I can to make it happen.
>>
>> IMO there's almost no chance this can go into 2.5.
> 
> "almost"?
> 
> I'll go you one better. No way at all will it be in 2.5. And I'd be a 
> firm -1 on adding in to 2.6 as well. It encourages bad coding. You 
> shouldn't be searching lists and tuples like that unless you know 
> what you're doing.

NB: I did not support adding that method, only notified the OP of the
2.5 situation.

Georg

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4