RetroSearch Browse

Mon Jul 10 13:11:42 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-July/067191.html

On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 20:45:05 -0700, Neal Norwitz wrote:

> There hasn't been much positive response (in the original thread or
> here).  Given you forgot about it for over a year, how important can
> it be? :-)

For me it would be very important because I often wonder where the threads
are currently working in my multithreaded apps. As a partial solution, I
wrote a "thread monitor" that tracks all thread's frames using a trace
function and generates tracebacks on demand. This slows down program
execution of course. With that function, it would be much simpler to see
the current state of the program (which is trivial in environments like the
JVM for example).

Kind regards,
Alexander

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-July/067191.html below:

[Python-Dev] "Missing" 2.5 feature