RetroSearch Browse

Sun Jul 9 04:48:38 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-July/067162.html

On 7/7/06, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
>
> On 7/8/06, Ka-Ping Yee <python-dev at zesty.ca> wrote:
> > The situation you're describing here is a classic case of one
> > component keeping a closely held authority while using it to
> > provide some limited capability to some other component.  This
> > comes up quite often when you're trying to write secure code.
> >
> > If you want to be able to write that subsystem in Python, then
> > we will need a way to create airtight Python objects (i.e. objects
> > that only leak what they explicitly choose to leak).
> >
> > So this goes back to the big question of goals:
> >
> >     Do we want to be able to protect one piece of Python code
> >     from another piece of Python code?
> >
> > I'd like the answer to be yes.  It sounded for a while like this
> > was not part of Brett's plan, though.  Now i'm not so sure.  It
> > sounds like you're also interested in having the answer be yes?
> >
> > Let's keep talking about and playing with more examples -- i think
> > they'll help us understand what goals we should aim for and what
> > pitfalls to anticipate before we nail down too many details.
>
> I'd like the answer to be no, because I don't believe that we can
> trust the VM to provide sufficient barriers. The old pre-2.2
> restricted execution mode tried to do this but 2.2 punched a million
> holes in it. Python isn't designed for this (it doesn't even enforce
> private attributes). I guess this is also the main reason I'm
> skeptical about capabilities for Python.

My plan is no.  As Guido said, getting this right is  feasibly
questionable.  I do not plan on trying to have security proxies or such
implemented in Python code; it will need to be in C.  If someone comes along
and manages to find a way to make Python work without significantly changing
the languages, great, and we can toss out my security implementation for
that.

But as of right now, I am not planning on making Python code safe to run in
Python code.

-Brett

--
> --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060708/1edabd3c/attachment.html 

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-July/067162.html below:

[Python-Dev] In defense of Capabilities [was: doc for new restricted execution design for Python]