RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jul 7 19:04:55 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-July/067134.html

On 7/7/06, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
>
> Another thing I perhaps should point out is that
> I'm proposing the separation of open() and file()
> for *all* code, not just restricted code. So it's
> not a matter of "crippling" file() specially for
> restricted code.

Well, that's fine with me since I use open() for opening all of my files
anyway.  But I don't know if people want to make 'file' the only built-in
type who lacks a constructor on the type itself.

-Brett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060707/50760867/attachment.html 

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-July/067134.html below:

[Python-Dev] doc for new restricted execution design for Python