RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jul 7 09:35:42 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-July/067117.html

Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:

> So, my proposal is to give up on static, accept PEP 3103 with the
> following options:
>   - Syntax alternative 2+B (unindented cases, 'case in ...' for
> multiple cases).
>   - Semantics option 3 (def-time freezing)

I know it's only a bikeshed issue here, but wouldn't it be the first case where
a statement ending with ":" does not introduce an indented suite? Is it really
worth to create this non-orthogonality in the language?

IMHO, if we went for indentend cases, we could teach editors to indent cases
*only* 1 or 2 spaces. That would preserve orthogonality of the language, and
allow not to consume too much horizontal space.

Or, what about optionally indented cases? That is, allow both forms as correct
syntax. It would make it just a matter of style at that point (and Python will
finally have its first religious wars over indentation.... AT LAST! :)

Giovanni Bajo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-July/067117.html below:

[Python-Dev] Switch and static, redux