Tim Peters wrote: > Note that this is quite unlike Scheme, in which declaration must > appear before use (ignoring fancy letrec cases), I think that's overstating things a bit -- mutually recursive functions are quite easy to write in Scheme and don't look at all "fancy" (unless you object for some reason to using (define ...)). > and declaration must > also supply an initial binding (Scheme has no "unbound local" problem > because there's no way to create an uninitialized local). That much is true. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4