On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 16:44 -0500, Tim Peters wrote: > OTOH, I have no reason to _presume_ that this is their hoped-for > outcome wrt Python, neither to presume that the politics shaping their > tussle with Aladdin are relevant to the PSF. "The law" is rarely > applied uniformly, in large part because it usually is means rather > than end. Python is a high-profile project that hasn't been hiding > its readline module, and if I presume anything here it's that the FSF > would have complained by now if they really didn't want this. I agree, and suggest we do nothing unless the FSF asks us to. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060130/9230701f/attachment.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4