RetroSearch Browse

Sun Jan 29 17:55:36 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-January/060200.html

>>>>> "Martin" == Martin v Löwis <martin at v.loewis.de> writes:

    >> BTW. The argument that the readline module should be GPL
    >> licensed seems rather stronger, it's designed to work with a
    >> GPL-ed library and doesn't work with a BSD licensed work-alike
    >> of that library.

    Martin> This is the question what constitutes derivative work, and
    Martin> different lawyers have said different things in the
    Martin> past. If we really want to find out, we should ask a
    Martin> lawyer.

You also need to ask about the cost of defending against a lawsuit by
the FSF, which is both the copyright holder of the library and the
primary advocate of the interpretation that a work which is intended
to be linked with another work is a derivative.  I think the FSF
pretty much would have to fight any claims that contest its
interpretation of the concept of "derived work", because any
interpretation that requires a direct source-to-source copy will make
the GPL irrelevant.

-- 
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba                    Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
               Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
              ask what your business can "do for" free software.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-January/060200.html below:

[Python-Dev] DRAFT: python-dev Summary for 2006-01-01 through 2006-01-15