RetroSearch Browse

Sun Jan 29 10:11:38 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-January/060197.html

"Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> writes:

> The source distribution would contain aclocal.m4; it would not
> contain the autoconf/autoheader tools themselves.

To a rather different point, do we need aclocal.m4 at all?  This is
the log for aclocal.m4:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r34284 | anthonybaxter | 2003-09-27 11:12:27 +0200 (Sat, 27 Sep 2003) | 5 lines

fix for bug #811160 - autoconf vs. hp/ux system header files.
also applied to release23-maint.

Note that aclocal.m4 can go away when autoconf 2.58 is out.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

I think 2.58 actually had a brown-paper-bag release style bug, but
2.59 has been out for ages now.  If we were prepared to
AC_PREREQ(2.59), I think this whole issue could go away.

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
  Finding a needle in a haystack is a lot easier if you burn down
  the haystack and scan the ashes with a metal detector.
      -- the Silicon Valley Tarot (another one nicked from David Rush)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-January/060197.html below:

[Python-Dev] (libffi) Re: Copyright issue