Michael Hoffman wrote:
> I've been using path.py for some time, and I can tell you that it
> would be a lot less useful if it no longer behaved like string-plus.
As Jason pointed out elsewhere, the strict typechecks that exist *in* the
Python core, and the fact that path.py is *outside* that core makes the
workaround of subclassing string necessary.
Since the PEP process has the power to alter the *core*, then we have other
options than "this is a string, only not".
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4